The State of Vue.js Report 2025 is now available! Case studies, key trends and community insights.

Read now
Minimalist graphical cover for article about web application security. In the center of the image is a locked padlock with document icons beneath it, the icon is surrounded by abstract graphical elements.

Web Application Security Assessment: Critical Questions That Could Save Your Company

Modern web application security breaches cost organizations an average of $4.8 million globally, with 83% of companies experiencing multiple incidents. Traditional annual audits create false confidence through compliance rituals, while real protection requires continuous business web application security assessment practices and strategic questioning

This guide provides a 12-question framework that transforms technical vulnerabilities into business consequences, enabling leaders to conduct effective web app vulnerability assessment without becoming technical experts. Success depends on embedding security as a business discipline, not just an IT function, making it a competitive advantage rather than a compliance burden.

Cybersecurity conversations often feel like déjà vu: the same warnings, the same reassurances, the same technical jargon that rarely translates into actual safety.

Everything is under control, until it is not. And when the shield cracks, it cracks hard. 

The math behind modern breaches is brutal. With an average cost of $4.8 million globally, and nearly $10 million in the US (IBM, 2024), a breach isn’t just an IT fire drill. It’s a full-blown business crisis, capable of rewriting a company’s future overnight. 

But the most revealing figure isn’t the price tag; it’s the recurrence. Eighty-three percent of organizations suffer multiple breaches, not because of bad luck or elite cyber villains which shows a fundamental gap between how companies perceive security and how security actually functions

Executives may greenlight budgets and check compliance boxes, but a more critical question looms:

Are we truly secure, or just secure enough to pass the next audit?

The answer starts with reframing security assessment not as a technical checkbox, but as a core business discipline. Just as CFOs don’t need to be CPAs to catch financial irregularities, business leaders don’t need to write code to spot cybersecurity blind spots - they just need to ask the right questions.

Web application security assessments are an ideal starting point: a structured, practical lens through which any leader can assess real risk.

What follows is a toolkit of sharp, actionable questions to help you determine whether your web applications are genuinely protected - or simply waiting their turn in the breach cycle.

Key Takeaways

  • Modern breaches are expensive and recurring - with average costs of $4.8 million globally and 83% of organizations experiencing multiple breaches, web app security for business leaders requires continuous attention, not periodic compliance. 

  • Traditional audits create false sense of confidence - annual security reviews often miss real vulnerabilities while providing a false sense of security through compliance documentation.

  • Business leaders don't need technical expertise - using the right business web app security questions framework, executives can effectively evaluate security posture without becoming cybersecurity experts.

  • Authentication and access control are critical - most breaches begin with compromised credentials or forgotten access permissions, making identity management a top priority.

  • Third-party risks multiply exposure - every vendor, SaaS tool, and integration becomes a potential entry point for attackers, requiring systematic web application vulnerability audit practices.

  • Security must be a business discipline - organizations that treat security as a continuous business practice rather than an IT function achieve better protection and competitive advantage.

  • Proactive security drives business value - companies with strong security practices close deals faster, reduce regulatory friction, and build customer trust more effectively.

How Often Do Web Apps Get Hacked?

The answer isn’t just in the stats - it’s in the wreckage left behind. While 83% of organizations report multiple breaches, the headlines of 2025 reveal the why: catastrophic fallout from basic, preventable flaws hiding in plain sight.

Time and again, we see billion-dollar companies with elite security teams undone by simple oversights that should’ve been caught.

Recent Web App Breaches That Made Headlines

  • Coinbase

Cryptocurrency giant Coinbase fell victim to a breach that exposed 69,461 customers' sensitive data not through sophisticated blockchain exploits or zero-day vulnerabilities, but through something far more basic: overseas customer support contractors who were bribed to leak information. 

Starting in December 2024 and continuing undetected until May 2025, attackers systematically recruited support agents in India, paying them to steal customer names, addresses, government ID images, account balances, and partial Social Security numbers. 

The business impact was swift and severe: Coinbase faced a $20 million extortion demand (which they refused), potential costs between $180-400 million for remediation and customer reimbursement, and a shareholder lawsuit alleging securities violations. 

The breach highlighted a fundamental security-by-design failure - the company had invested heavily in cryptographic security while leaving basic access controls and contractor oversight dangerously exposed. 

  • Yale New Haven Health System

Healthcare giant Yale New Haven Health System discovered in March 2025 that hackers had copied data belonging to 5.6 million patients during what appeared to be a ransomware attack.

The compromised information included names, dates of birth, addresses, Social Security numbers, and medical record numbers - essentially everything needed for comprehensive identity theft. Despite the massive scale, patient care operations weren't disrupted, and no financial accounts or electronic medical records were directly accessed, suggesting the breach stemmed from vulnerabilities in peripheral systems rather than core infrastructure. 

The incident exemplifies, however, how security gaps in supporting systems can expose core business data. Healthcare organizations often focus security investments on protecting electronic health records while overlooking the dozens of ancillary systems that also handle patient information. When these secondary systems lack the same protection standards, they become attractive entry points for attackers seeking high-value data.

  • SAP NetWeaver

Multiple organizations suffered breaches through a critical vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver that remained unpatched despite being actively exploited in the wild. Dutch cybersecurity firm EclecticIQ tracked the attacks to several advanced persistent threat groups who deployed web shells, reverse shells, and various malware families to maintain persistent access. 

An exposed server tied to the campaign revealed both compromised assets and future targeting lists, showing the systematic nature of these supply chain attacks.

This breach pattern represents one of the most concerning trends in web application security: attacks that exploit widely-used business software to gain footholds across multiple organizations simultaneously. When enterprise software vendors fail to patch critical vulnerabilities quickly, the impact multiplies across their entire customer base, turning a single oversight into an industry-wide crisis.

Each of these breaches reinforces the same uncomfortable truth: security failures rarely stem from the sophisticated attack vectors that dominate headlines. Instead, they emerge from mundane operational gaps - insufficient contractor oversight, excessive user privileges, delayed patching, and the dangerous assumption that someone else is handling the fundamentals.

What Are the Traditional Security Audits and Why They Fail?

A traditional security audit is a scheduled, structured review of your organization’s systems, policies, and controls. It checks whether your security posture aligns with established standards or internal guidelines at a specific point in time.

Traditional security audits usually involve:

  • reviewing documentation, 

  • testing technical safeguards (like firewalls, access controls, and encryption),

  • interviewing staff, 

  • inspecting configurations, 

  • and evaluating incident response plans. 

The result? A tidy report listing vulnerabilities and to-dos.

Most audits happen annually or semi-annually. The aim is simple: prove compliance. Show regulators, clients, or internal stakeholders that everything is, at least on paper, under control.

This model didn’t appear out of nowhere, it originated in the finance sector, the homeland of structures, checklists, and ritual compliance.

Over time, that legacy became part of the problem. But in the late 1980s and ’90s, as businesses digitized operations and regulators scrambled to keep up, that approach broke into the mainstream. Security reviews became periodic rituals - structured, checklist-based, and designed to offer assurance that systems were working as intended.

With the rise of compliance-heavy regulations - HIPAA, SOX, PCI-DSS - audits became the go-to method for validating security, and certifications like ISO 27001 or SOC 2 emerged as the gold standards for proving a company is secure.

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act): Required health organizations to protect patient information and regularly prove compliance.

SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act): Forced public companies to verify that financial data, systems, and controls were secure and reliable.

PCI-DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard): Obligated companies processing credit cards to demonstrate ongoing protection of payment data.

ISO 27001/2: These are international standards for how companies should manage and protect sensitive information. If a company is certified, it means an independent auditor has confirmed that its security practices meet strict, up-to-date global guidelines.

SOC (System and Organization Controls) Reports: These reports are often used by cloud and service companies to show they’re managing data safely and responsibly. SOC 1 focuses on financial processes, while SOC 2 looks at things like security, privacy, and system reliability

Traditional audits produce detailed technical reports- vulnerability scores, patch status, firewall rules, encryption standards. Useful for IT teams, yes. But for business leaders? Often unreadable and disconnected from what actually matters.

As a result, findings often stay siloed in IT departments, and leadership remains unaware of real exposure. This communication gap prevents real change.

Also, audits are typically performed once or twice a year, and what deems your systems "secure" in January doesn't have to be 100% true in March. That lag between reviews creates windows of vulnerability - often just long enough for attackers to get in.

Having said this it's worth noting that traditional audits aren’t the enemy - but they aren’t enough. Business leaders can’t afford to treat them as the final word on security. Instead, they need to go further: asking questions that connect technical findings to business priorities.

This shift - from passive audit recipients to active security stewards - marks the difference between organizations that simply "comply" and those that actually protect themselves.

The 12-Question Web Application Security Assessment Framework

To move beyond compliance, leaders need to reframe how they engage with security. It’s not just about checking boxes or reading audit summaries - it’s about understanding where the real risks lie and how they could impact the business.

The following framework outlines 4 critical areas of modern web app security and, more importantly, the key questions leaders should be asking to turn technical findings into strategic decisions.

1. Authentication & Access Control

Authentication answers “Who are you?”; access control answers “What can you do here?” These processes are digital gatekeepers to every business system - if they fail, an attacker (or disgruntled former staff) can access sensitive data or disrupt operations.

It would not be an exaggeration to say that a great part of major breaches start with cracked credentials, stolen tokens, or forgotten access given to ex-employees or old vendors. With cloud and SaaS, these issues are amplified by the sprawl of OAuth permissions and integrations.

What if neglected?

  • A single compromised admin password could give a hacker the keys to every system, database, or customer record.

  • Former staff, contractors, or vendors might retain “ghost” access for months; in a real case, ex-employees have siphoned proprietary data or sabotaged services because their accounts weren’t removed.

  • Mismanaged OAuth or cookie tokens mean attackers can “inherit” trusted sessions - sometimes for years - evading all monitoring.

Business Leadership Questions:

  • Do we use two-factor login for all important accounts, especially admin ones?

  • When someone leaves the company, do we remove all their access right away—including to SaaS tools?

  • If a password or login token gets stolen, can we quickly shut down any risky sessions before damage happens?

2. Input Validation & Data Protection

Application breaches often exploit unvalidated input - attackers feed in malicious content (like code in a form) that systems accept, opening the door to data theft, fraud, or full server compromise. Data leaks also result when sensitive business/customer info isn’t handled or encrypted properly.

These vulnerabilities (including XSS and SQL Injection) consistently top the software industry’s annual “most dangerous” lists.

What if neglected?

  • Classic XSS and SQL injection have led to attackers stealing millions of customer records, rewriting website content, or emptying databases overnight (think: stolen payment info, sabotage, reputation damage).

  • Inadequate data encryption means sensitive information is exposed if servers are stolen, backups lost, or traffic intercepted - insurers and regulators now levy multi-million fines for such lapses.

  • Lax file uploads open the gates to ransomware: A single malicious upload can give hackers full control or spread across your whole network.

Business Leadership Questions:

  • Do we check and clean all user and API inputs to block known attack tricks?

  • Is all private or sensitive information encrypted - so that if someone steals a laptop or database, they still can't read it?

  • Can someone upload a dangerous file to our system that could infect us or our customers?

3. Third-Party Dependencies & Integrations

Most organizations now depend on a web of vendors, SaaS tools, cloud APIs, and open-source libraries to deliver the business - even for core functions. It is convenient, but it is also good to remember that every outsider becomes a potential insider threat. If a third party is breached, their compromise can cascade into your critical data and systems.

"The modern ‘software as a service’ (SaaS) delivery model is quietly enabling cyber attackers and - as its adoption grows - is creating a substantial vulnerability that is weakening the global economic system... SaaS has become the default and is often the only format in which software is now delivered, leaving organizations with little choice but to rely heavily on a small set of leading service providers, embedding concentration risk into global critical infrastructure... This model delivers efficiency and rapid innovation, it simultaneously magnifies the impact of any weakness, outage, or breach, creating single points of failure with potentially catastrophic systemwide consequences."

-Patrick Opet, Chief Information Security Officer at JPMorgan Chase (Open Letter to Third-Party Suppliers, March 2025).

What if neglected?

  • Major breaches (e.g., SolarWinds, MOVEit) have occurred when attackers entered through a less-secure vendor, then pivoted to much larger targets.

  • Few companies notice when suppliers, SaaS vendors, or open-source libraries become compromised or neglected; your exposure persists and multiplies without your knowledge.

  • Contracts without clear security stipulations have left businesses unable to respond or recover when partners are breached.

Business Leadership Questions:

  • Can our vendors and SaaS providers prove they protect our data as well as we do?

  • How do we find out if there’s a new security problem or an actual hack in the tools and software we use?

  • If one of our key vendors gets hacked, could that give hackers access to our systems too?

4. Monitoring & Incident Response

No system is bulletproof, so fast detection and practiced response determines how much damage an attacker or accident can do. Without real-time monitoring and an actionable incident playbook, attack dwell time stretches from minutes into weeks, and small problems can become front-page disasters.

What if neglected?

  • Companies have lost millions not because they were attacked, but because it took months to notice the breach - giving attackers time to drain databases, alter records, or plant ransomware.

  • Without real-world-tested response plans, teams panic, miscommunicate, or hide incidents - leading to PR disasters, regulatory fines, and prolonged downtimes.

  • Lack of business continuity planning turns a hack or outage into an existential crisis; some companies never recover operations or trust.

Business Leadership Questions:

  • If hackers were inside our systems right now, would we notice or would it take weeks or months?

  • When did we last run a practice drill with the whole team to see how we’d respond to a breach?

  • If we got hit by a ransomware attack or system outage today, how fast could we get our critical services back up?

Tips to Improve Web Application Cybersecurity

We’ve covered the core “what” and “how” of security governance - those pivotal audit questions every leader needs to ask. But cybersecurity maturity goes much deeper than answering individual queries or passing annual reviews. 

Truly resilient organizations cultivate security as a continuous, living feature of their culture and decision-making - not just a compliance hurdle or IT project.

This section offers practical strategies that transcend any single audit or crisis:

  • Making security part of the business “muscle memory,” woven into everyday workflows and product decisions.

  • Fostering shared accountability, so risk doesn’t fall through the cracks or get stalled by overbearing processes.

  • Linking security to business outcomes, using metrics that everyone, from developers to executives, can understand and own.

These tips aren’t about one-time fixes. They help your business become safer, more adaptable, and ultimately more competitive, whatever new risks or opportunities come your way. 

Let’s look at how to build that kind of culture and mindset, where security isn’t just a department or afterthought, but a defining strength across your organization.

1. Security as a Business Design Principle

Security must be built in - not bolted on. When it’s embedded from the start, organizations reduce risk, avoid costly rework, and build lasting trust with customers.

Key Practices:

  • Integrate security requirements from business planning to product launch.

  • Make threat modeling and security assessments mandatory checkpoints.

  • Conduct security design reviews for all major products and partnerships.

Organization-wide awareness:

  • Extend security training to product, HR, marketing, and vendor teams.

  • Embed business-relevant security education into onboarding and ongoing learning.

  • Reinforce the business impact of security shortcuts—not just the technical risk.

2. Accountability Without Bureaucracy

Clear ownership is essential - but over-complicating it slows innovation. The goal is rapid, responsible security decisions embedded across the business.

Ownership & empowerment:

  • Assign responsibility for every key asset and process.

  • Include security goals in performance reviews across departments.

  • Establish clear escalation paths to encourage swift resolution over blame.

Culture of responsibility:

  • Recognize those who report risks, propose improvements, or challenge unsafe practices.

  • Appoint team-level security champions to address issues early.

Warning: Avoid common pitfalls that undermine effective security implementation. Bottlenecks can emerge when decision-making is overly centralized, slowing down progress and frustrating teams. Unclear responsibilities during incidents often lead to delays, miscommunication, or inaction at critical moments. And when ownership rests solely with a single person or department, it creates a fragile system vulnerable to failure - especially under pressure.

3. Business-Relevant Security Metrics

What leaders measure is what teams prioritize. Technical metrics alone don’t resonate - security must be linked to outcomes that matter to the business.

Strategic metrics:

  • Focus on results like uptime, trust scores, and estimated losses.

  • Report incident response effectiveness and risk reduction over time.

Executive-level communication:

  • Present security data alongside financial and operational metrics.

  • Use questions leadership already asks - e.g., vendor security rates or training completion.

  • Quantify impact in terms of business disruption or opportunity cost.

Operational integration:

  • Embed security KPIs into risk dashboards and business reviews.

  • Show how security enables growth, not just prevents loss.

  • Create feedback loops that connect security actions to business performance.

Why Web Application Security Is a Competitive Advantage

As the “security by design” principle gains momentum - backed by leading tech firms and governments - one thing is clear: proactive security isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s what modern customers expect, and what savvy business clients reward.

Companies that build security into their DNA - even beyond proving it through ISO, SOC 2, and transparent practices - don’t just reduce risk; they close deals faster, clear regulatory hurdles, and win lasting loyalty. Thus, credible security isn’t a feature but a filter.

The math speaks for itself. Waiting for a breach is expensive - financially and reputationally. The clean-up drags on, the headlines linger, and customers walk. On the other hand, organizations that invest early in secure web application development, active monitoring, and business-aligned audits not only bounce back faster - they rarely fall behind in the first place.

Even audits, often seen as a compliance chore, become brand assets. When third-party validations are public and plainspoken, they give customers more confidence than any privacy policy ever could. It’s no longer enough to say you’re secure - leaders show it.

Bottom line: security is no longer an IT metric - it’s a business signal. When done right, it’s visible, verifiable, and deeply valuable. 

The Business Cost of Cybersecurity Breaches Can Be Avoided

Every company that has suffered a breach believed they were protected right up until the moment they weren't. No wonder. Traditional security approaches create false confidence through annual compliance rituals, but forward-thinking leaders are discovering that genuine protection comes from asking the right questions consistently, not from having the biggest security budget.

The assessment framework we've outlined isn't just a checklist, it's a translation tool that converts technical vulnerabilities into business consequences and security investments into competitive advantages. Organizations that emerge stronger from today's threat landscape share one trait: they've transformed security from a periodic audit event into a continuous business discipline where leaders become fluent in the language of risk without becoming technical experts.

Your next move determines whether your organization joins the ranks of the repeatedly breached or becomes part of the security-strong minority that competitors study and customers trust.

Web Application Security FAQ

Kaja Grzybowska is a journalist-turned-content marketer specializing in creating content for software agencies. Drawing on her media background in research and her talent for simplifying complex technical concepts, she bridges the gap between tech and business audiences.